Finished experimental music essay. FINISHED UNI
This commit is contained in:
+38
-30
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{abstract}
|
||||
The use of electronic feedback as tools for musical composition has
|
||||
The use of electronic feedback as a tool for musical composition has
|
||||
featured in many compositions, popular for it's complex, volatile and
|
||||
indeterminate nature. Intrinsic to the use of feedback is the use of
|
||||
amplification, capable of artificially altering an input's energy, as a
|
||||
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
|
||||
feedback created by aiming a microphone to it's amplifier, or the digital
|
||||
feedback present in an IIR filter, in all cases a loop is created from an
|
||||
output point of a system, back to it's input.\\
|
||||
The two types of electronic feedback are:
|
||||
The two types of feedback to be discussed are:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item{Acoustic Feedback}
|
||||
\item{Electronic Feedback}
|
||||
@@ -88,29 +88,24 @@
|
||||
Acoustic feedback occurs when a closed loop is created between an audio
|
||||
transducer (such as a microphone or guitar pick-up) and amplifier,
|
||||
causing previously amplified audio to be re-amplified continuously at an
|
||||
exponential rate as illustrated in Figure~\ref{acoustic_feedback}.\\
|
||||
exponential rate, as illustrated in Figure~\ref{acoustic_feedback}.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\makebox[\textwidth]{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{acoustic_feedback_diagram}}
|
||||
\makebox[\textwidth]{\includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{acoustic_feedback_diagram}}
|
||||
\caption[Caption for LOF]{Acoustic Feedback Diagram\protect\footnotemark}
|
||||
\label{acoustic_feedback}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\footnotetext{Diagram taken from:~\parencite[p.185]{holmes2012eaem}}
|
||||
|
||||
This is a common problem in the context of live audio, as the exponential
|
||||
nature of the feedback causes a distinct ``howling'' sound that builds
|
||||
rapidly and is commonly considered unpleasant. As a result, a great deal of
|
||||
research has been carried out into methods for attenuating and controlling
|
||||
this effect.~\parencite[p.1]{waterschoot2010fyafc} However, the volatile
|
||||
and unpredictable nature of acoustic feedback has been used to great effect
|
||||
in both popular and avant-garde music.~\parencite[p.186]{holmes2012eaem}
|
||||
Pioneering guitarists such as Jimi Hendrix have used the loop created
|
||||
through placing an electric guitar pickup close to it's amplifier to
|
||||
compliment virtuosic guitar solos in pieces such as Foxey
|
||||
Lady~\citeyearpar{hendrix1967fl}. This is taken one step further in
|
||||
avant-garde works such as Steve Reich's Pendulum Music, where feedback
|
||||
becomes the focus of the piece entirely. This is discussed further in
|
||||
section~\ref{pendulum}
|
||||
The volatile and unpredictable nature of acoustic feedback has been used to
|
||||
great effect in both popular and avant-garde
|
||||
music.~\parencite[p.186]{holmes2012eaem} Pioneering guitarists such as Jimi
|
||||
Hendrix have used the loop created through placing an electric guitar
|
||||
pickup close to it's amplifier to compliment virtuosic guitar solos in
|
||||
pieces such as Foxey Lady~\citeyearpar{hendrix1967fl}. This is taken one
|
||||
step further in avant-garde works such as Steve Reich's Pendulum Music,
|
||||
where feedback becomes the focus of the piece entirely. This is discussed
|
||||
further in section~\ref{pendulum}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Electronic Feedback}
|
||||
Electronic feedback takes the principal of recursively feeding an output
|
||||
@@ -121,9 +116,9 @@
|
||||
The result of this process is then produced in the listening space via
|
||||
amplification~\parencite[p.187]{holmes2012eaem}. Composers such as David
|
||||
Tudor and Gordon Mumma explore these techniques through their creation and
|
||||
use of custom electronic circuits designed to exploit the characteristics
|
||||
use of custom electronics designed to exploit the characteristics
|
||||
of this effect.~\parencite[p.186, 390]{holmes2012eaem} A detailed analysis
|
||||
of these techniques are presented in section~\ref{ElecFeed}\\
|
||||
of these techniques are presented in section~\ref{ElecFeed}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Amplification}
|
||||
Amplification is the process of scaling a signal by a chosen factor.~\parencite[p.3-4]{kadis2012sosr}.
|
||||
@@ -234,13 +229,16 @@
|
||||
their output. This is demonstrated in Steve Reich's ``Pendulum Music'' as
|
||||
discussed in section~\ref{pendulum}. Parallels can be drawn between John
|
||||
Cage's use of indeterminacy to dictate organizational aspects of ``Music of
|
||||
Changes'' with Steve Reich's use of feedback to dictate sonic events in
|
||||
``Pendulum Music''.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes''~\citeyearpar{cage1951mfc} with Steve Reich's use of feedback to dictate sonic events in
|
||||
``Pendulum Music''.\\
|
||||
Feedback builds on methods such as Cage's use of the I Ching as far greater
|
||||
quantity of unpredictable events can be generated quickly, compared to the
|
||||
manual ``brute-force'' approach of generating each event as is the case
|
||||
with the I Ching.
|
||||
\subsection{Process and Control}
|
||||
The term ``process'' refers to the situation outlined by a composer,
|
||||
designed for the creation of sound. Where popular music focuses on creating
|
||||
pre-defined musical content and structure, experimental musicians focus on
|
||||
pre-defined musical content and structure, experimental musicians typically focus on
|
||||
the creation of a process through which sound may be generated. This may
|
||||
involve the creation of rules or instructions that outline the conditions
|
||||
that are needed in order to create an outcome, the content of which may
|
||||
@@ -258,8 +256,8 @@
|
||||
processes involved in the piece's realisation. This is true of Gordon
|
||||
Mumma's Hornpipe~\citeyearpar{mumma2002lem} (as detailed in
|
||||
section~\ref{hornpipe}) where electronic circuitry is designed specifically
|
||||
to explore the effects of custom electronic circuitry used to produce
|
||||
controlled feedback~\parencite[p.8, 390]{nyman1999em}\\
|
||||
to explore the effects of using custom electronic circuitry to produce
|
||||
controlled feedback~\parencite[p.8, 390]{nyman1999em}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Feedback Control}
|
||||
As stated previously, feedback can be difficult to control due to it's
|
||||
@@ -369,16 +367,16 @@
|
||||
Pendulum Music focuses directly on the sonic phenomena generated purely by
|
||||
the feedback system and the acoustics of the space~\parencite[p.50-51]{weisert2010ioi}.
|
||||
|
||||
Aesthetically the piece begins with clear rhythms created by the distinct
|
||||
Aesthetically, the piece begins with clear rhythms created by the distinct
|
||||
motion of the microphones as they pass over the speakers. This slowly
|
||||
degrades as the microphones lose momentum, resulting in the pure feedback
|
||||
tones created as the microphones hang motionless over the speaker at the
|
||||
end. Interesting phase relationships can be observed between the
|
||||
microphones as the piece progresses, which is in keeping with Reichs works
|
||||
microphones as the piece progresses, which is in keeping with Reich's works
|
||||
such as Come Out~\citeyearpar{reich1966comeout}
|
||||
|
||||
This piece has a clear focus on process and was described as ``the ultimate
|
||||
process piece'' by Reich. Designed as an ``audible sculpture'', the piece is
|
||||
process piece'' by Reich. Realised as an ``audible sculpture'', the piece is
|
||||
designed to limit human interaction in order to focus on the natural
|
||||
interaction of acoustic feedback. Control of aesthetics is determined by
|
||||
the semi-indeterministic method of releasing the suspended microphones,
|
||||
@@ -389,7 +387,10 @@
|
||||
tone etc\ldots are largely left to chance. This created a stark contrast
|
||||
between the compositional process and chaos process presented through the
|
||||
uncontrolled feedback~\parencite[p.186]{holmes2012eaem}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This piece fits in with reich's other work through it's exploration of theme
|
||||
such as audio phaseing and rhythm, similar to that of his works such as Come
|
||||
Out~\citeyearpar{reich1966comeout} and Clapping Music~\citeyearpar{reich1966clap}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Robert Ashley's The Wolfman~\citeyearpar{ashley2003w}}\label{wolfman}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -427,6 +428,9 @@
|
||||
circuit live, the performer is given control over the rhythmic aspects of
|
||||
the output. This results in the controlled use of the complex rhythms
|
||||
possible with feedback.
|
||||
Pulsers focused primarily on the aesthetic potential of manipulating analog
|
||||
circuitry, particularly on the rhythmic impact of altering analog
|
||||
components.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Untitled}\mbox{}\\
|
||||
Untitled was created as an exploration of the use of ``no-input'' live
|
||||
@@ -444,6 +448,10 @@
|
||||
manageable in terms of live performance. This is a good example of the
|
||||
indeterminate, complex nature of
|
||||
feedback.~\parencite[p.83-85]{weisert2010ioi}
|
||||
This piece served as an attempt to explore the musical possibilities
|
||||
created purely from the sound of the electronics themselves. This differed
|
||||
from the conventional use of electronics to alter an external sound created
|
||||
by an oscillator or external audio source.~\parencite{tudor1984twle}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Gordon Mumma's Hornpipe~\citeyearpar{mumma2002lem}}\label{hornpipe}
|
||||
Hornpipe is a composition that combines the input from a French horn with
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,6 +65,15 @@
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{abstract}
|
||||
This report presents research into the effects of artificial electronic
|
||||
processing on musical quality. Examining data collected through the use
|
||||
of a survey, comparisons are made to observe any links between the
|
||||
increased use of artificial processing and public opinion on musical
|
||||
quality. Results presented indicate a possible link between these
|
||||
factors and suggestions are made as to possible reasons for these
|
||||
results. Limitations of the research are also acknowledged with
|
||||
suggestions for possible alterations and improvements to be considered
|
||||
in any further research.
|
||||
\end{abstract}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +93,7 @@
|
||||
specific purpose of hiding these imperfections. Room acoustics can now be
|
||||
transformed, drum rhythms tightened and dynamics altered to improve almost
|
||||
any aspect of the original recording. This potentially allows for greater
|
||||
degrees of of error from the origonal musician, allowing a technician to
|
||||
degrees of of error from the original musician, allowing a technician to
|
||||
compensate.~\parencite{bbc2014crm}\\
|
||||
These techniques are used to varying degrees in different styles of music
|
||||
and are not purely used as a means for musical correction. Many musical
|
||||
@@ -104,22 +113,22 @@
|
||||
Review of the literature related to this project reveals extensive research
|
||||
into subject areas closely related to this project. Research into musical
|
||||
preference has been conducted in a number of instances and demonstrates
|
||||
that there are a large number of social and phsycoacoustic aspects that
|
||||
that there are a large number of social and psychoacoustic aspects that
|
||||
influence musical preference. There is a significant amount of
|
||||
information regarding musical talent and what defines high quality music.
|
||||
The final aspect that relates closely to this research is that of sound
|
||||
quality, which has been researched at length in order to determine not only
|
||||
the best ways of recording sound, but highly technical methods for the
|
||||
analysis and catagorisations of sounds based on human
|
||||
analysis and categorisations of sounds based on human
|
||||
perception~\parencite{hal}.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Musical Preference Research}
|
||||
There are a number of resources available that attempt to analyse some of
|
||||
the phsycological effects of music. research such as that carried out by
|
||||
the physiological effects of music. Research such as that carried out by
|
||||
Ladinig and Schellenberg attempts to analyse participant emotional
|
||||
reactions to different types of music, measuring for emotional reactions
|
||||
such as perceived intensity, happiness, and sadness~\parencite{lum}. This
|
||||
research suggests that charachter traits such as extroversion and
|
||||
research suggests that character traits such as extroversion and
|
||||
agreeableness influence a persons preference on music. This is one of many
|
||||
studies that focus on these types of
|
||||
influence~\parencite{kessler2004semmp,eamim}
|
||||
@@ -127,12 +136,12 @@
|
||||
has also been undertaken in recognising relationships between styles of
|
||||
music and social phenomena. This can be found in Popular Music and
|
||||
Society~\parencite{longhurst2007pmas} that provides a substantial insight
|
||||
into the effects of sociy on music and vice-versa. Issues such as
|
||||
into the effects of society on music and vice-versa. Issues such as
|
||||
technology, sexuality and ethnicity all effect perception.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Musical Talent Research}
|
||||
An equaly broad range of literature can be found regarding opinions on what
|
||||
makes a high qulity composition or performance. Literature on musical
|
||||
An equally broad range of literature can be found regarding opinions on what
|
||||
makes a high quality composition or performance. Literature on musical
|
||||
talent outlines perceptions of what is regarded as high quality music and
|
||||
what is seen to be favourable traits in terms of composition and
|
||||
performance. This is predominantly focused on the development of musical
|
||||
@@ -151,13 +160,13 @@
|
||||
combined use of questionnaires, the amalgamation of information gathered
|
||||
from previous research and analysis of collected data, it is hoped that
|
||||
this report will provide an indication as to whether artificial music
|
||||
processing has any effect on opinions accross a variety of popular music
|
||||
processing has any effect on opinions across a variety of popular music
|
||||
genres.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Methodology}
|
||||
Research will be carried out through the use of a questionnaire to gather
|
||||
opinions on artificial processing in relation to a wide range of genres.
|
||||
A questionnaire has been created to collect quantitive data from annonymous
|
||||
A questionnaire has been created to collect quantitative data from anonymous
|
||||
participants. This data will then be analysed to reveal any correlations
|
||||
between views on musical quality and perceptions of artificial processing.
|
||||
These results will then be compared to previous research presented in
|
||||
@@ -167,32 +176,32 @@
|
||||
\subsection{Procedure}
|
||||
The majority of original research has been carried out through the design and
|
||||
collection of data from a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed for
|
||||
the quantitive analysis of annonymous oppinions on the perceived
|
||||
the quantitative analysis of anonymous opinions on the perceived
|
||||
artificialness and musical quality of a range of musical samples.
|
||||
Comparisson of results with previous research is preseneted and
|
||||
Comparison of results with previous research is presented and
|
||||
observations are made on possible reasons for results.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Questionnaire Design}
|
||||
The questionnaire was designed with two main sections. The first gave an
|
||||
indication of the participant's musical knowlege and preference, the second
|
||||
indication of the participant's musical knowledge and preference, the second
|
||||
collected the main data based on the participant's use of a likeart scales
|
||||
to rate aspects of the excepts.\\
|
||||
It was expected that a number of factors would influence a participant's
|
||||
rating of both musical talent and synthetic characteristics. The most
|
||||
prominent factor was thought to be the participant's background in terms of
|
||||
music and music technology training. A participant with an in depth
|
||||
understaning of composition and performance would most likely have a
|
||||
understanding of composition and performance would most likely have a
|
||||
heightened sensitivity to the musical aspects of the examples that an
|
||||
untrained participant may not pick up on. To account for this, participants
|
||||
were simply asked to state if they have any musical/music technological
|
||||
training. This could then be taken into account in the analysis of results.
|
||||
Another factor that would most likely affect a participants decision was
|
||||
their preference with regaurds to musical style. as stated in
|
||||
section~\ref{LR}, many factors influence a person's muical preference in
|
||||
their preference with regards to musical style. As stated in
|
||||
section~\ref{LR}, many factors influence a person's musical preference in
|
||||
terms of genre, and so accounting for bias towards certain musical styles
|
||||
was required in an attempt to create more a more objective analysis.\\
|
||||
|
||||
To begin selection of suitable matireal for the questionnaire, 5 genres were selected:
|
||||
To begin selection of suitable material for the questionnaire, 5 genres were selected:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Classical
|
||||
\item Rock
|
||||
@@ -201,9 +210,9 @@
|
||||
\item Pop
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
A selection of 40 thirty second audio samples were then used for ratings,
|
||||
sourced from a wide variety of artists accross these 5 genres.
|
||||
sourced from a wide variety of artists across these 5 genres.
|
||||
Participants were asked to rate these samples for their musical
|
||||
accomplishment, articificialness and how much they liked the audio clip.
|
||||
accomplishment, artificialness and how much they liked the audio clip.
|
||||
Musicality and artificialness would give a clear and simple representation
|
||||
of the value placed for these parameters, which could then be compared on a
|
||||
genre by genre basis to determine any outstanding patterns. The musical
|
||||
@@ -212,25 +221,25 @@
|
||||
musicality of pieces in genres they like more highly than genres they
|
||||
dislike. The results of these hypothesis are determined in section~\ref{analysis}\\
|
||||
|
||||
A section for participant comments was created at the botom of the test to
|
||||
A section for participant comments was created at the bottom of the test to
|
||||
allow participants to share thoughts on the survey. This would allow
|
||||
participants to provide further insites that might provide information that
|
||||
participants to provide further insights that might provide information that
|
||||
would not have otherwise been considered.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Results}
|
||||
Results were predominantly quantitive, and so did not require the same
|
||||
Results were predominantly quantitative, and so did not require the same
|
||||
degree of subjective analysis that would have been the case with
|
||||
qualitative results. A total of 20 participants took the survey, resulting
|
||||
in a dataset containing 800 data points accross the range of genres. This
|
||||
in a dataset containing 800 data points across the range of genres. This
|
||||
provided enough data for a reasonable analysis of comparable opinions
|
||||
accross the range of participants. The amount of data collected may not be
|
||||
across the range of participants. The amount of data collected may not be
|
||||
sufficient for conclusive evidence as to the effects of electronic
|
||||
processing on opinions of musicality, however it should provide an
|
||||
indication as to possible correlations between the two factors.
|
||||
There are also a number of factors, beyond control in the context of this
|
||||
research, that will have affected the results.\\
|
||||
|
||||
The varying levels of musical training accross participants has most likely
|
||||
The varying levels of musical training across participants has most likely
|
||||
had a significant effect on results. It was expected that participant's
|
||||
opinions on the synthetic nature of pieces would be affected by this
|
||||
factor. Students that had studied music technology would most likely have a
|
||||
@@ -240,9 +249,9 @@
|
||||
should be taken into account when review results.\\
|
||||
|
||||
Another key factor is the participant's subjective definitions of musical
|
||||
quality and accombplishment. This factor was made clear by the comments of
|
||||
a participant who regaurded the lyrical content of the examples to be the
|
||||
determining factor. This contrasted the composition arangement
|
||||
quality and accomplishment. This factor was made clear by the comments of
|
||||
a participant who regarded the lyrical content of the examples to be the
|
||||
determining factor. This contrasted the composition arrangement
|
||||
characteristics that were the primary focus of many musically trained
|
||||
participants.\\
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -273,7 +282,7 @@
|
||||
\label{agmvs}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
The same analysis was then performed on a genre by genre basis. This was to
|
||||
gain a more detailed understanding of the relationship accross each genre.
|
||||
gain a more detailed understanding of the relationship across each genre.
|
||||
It was expected that the relationship would vary as some genres are
|
||||
typically more closely associated with electronic processing than other.
|
||||
For example, musical quality would not be negatively affected by a use of
|
||||
@@ -301,29 +310,29 @@
|
||||
|
||||
When comparing variable in this manner, the coefficient of determination
|
||||
has been used to measure the confidence of the correlation. This value is
|
||||
low accross all analyses and suggests a weak corellation, however this is
|
||||
low across all analyses and suggests a weak correlation, however this is
|
||||
expected due to the large number of other variables and the subjective
|
||||
nature of the test that affects results. However it can be observed that
|
||||
there is a much higher $R^2$ value for classical, which could be attributed
|
||||
to the natural nature of classical music.
|
||||
Graphs for all genres can be found in Appendix B.\\
|
||||
|
||||
Further analysese were created, regarding the relationship between the
|
||||
Further analyses were created, regarding the relationship between the
|
||||
participant's preference in terms of genre and their perception of musical
|
||||
quality. It was thought that participants (particularly those that had not
|
||||
had significant musical training) would most likely link musical
|
||||
accomplishment with their musical preference and thus rate examples more
|
||||
highly if they were in their prefered genre, regardless of quality. By
|
||||
analysing the frequency of high ratings in prefered genres, an indication
|
||||
highly if they were in their preferred genre, regardless of quality. By
|
||||
analysing the frequency of high ratings in preferred genres, an indication
|
||||
of the level of bias towards favoured genres was estimated. Results of this
|
||||
analysis show that for genres such as Classical, participants who favoured
|
||||
that genre rated examples highly. This is not true of all genres as a
|
||||
more even distribution of ratings is obseverved in the electronic genre.
|
||||
Another key factor is the actualy quality of examples. If all samples were
|
||||
percieved to be of high quality by all participants then a similar problem
|
||||
more even distribution of ratings is observed in the electronic genre.
|
||||
Another key factor is the actually quality of examples. If all samples were
|
||||
perceived to be of high quality by all participants then a similar problem
|
||||
would be shown. Overall this analysis was not nearly as accurate or useful
|
||||
as the initial analysis, however it does show that there are many elements
|
||||
to be considerd with this type of research and the simplicity of this
|
||||
to be considered with this type of research and the simplicity of this
|
||||
approach could be improved through further consideration of the elements.
|
||||
Graphs of these results can be found in Appendix B.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -331,33 +340,33 @@
|
||||
This research takes a relatively simplistic approach to a significantly
|
||||
broad area of research. There are many factors that have not been accounted
|
||||
for that have significant impact on the outcome. On reflection, the
|
||||
following improvments may allow for more robust analysis and more
|
||||
following improvements may allow for more robust analysis and more
|
||||
convincing results than those presented in this report:
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Increasing the number of possible values for rating}\mbox{}\\
|
||||
A number of comments were made, suggesting that the survey could be
|
||||
increasing the range of the scale used for ratings. Participants felt that
|
||||
five possible choices was not sufficient for accuratley rating all fourty
|
||||
five possible choices was not sufficient for accurately rating all forty
|
||||
samples. Having an increased number of points would allow for more fine
|
||||
grained choice for each of the parameters and would also offer smaller
|
||||
distinctions between ratings in the analysis stage.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{A wider variety of genres/varying quality of examples}\mbox{}\\
|
||||
Effort was made to design a questionnaire that would portray a wide variety
|
||||
of examples in order to gain insigight into perceptions of electronic
|
||||
processing on many genres. However, it was neccesary to limit the number of
|
||||
of examples in order to gain insight into perceptions of electronic
|
||||
processing on many genres. However, it was necessary to limit the number of
|
||||
genres in order to gain a detailed analysis of each genre included in the
|
||||
survey. This resulted in many types of music being disregarded. An increase
|
||||
in the types of music would have potentially produced a clearer overall
|
||||
picture of perceptions.\\
|
||||
The quality of the examples was also an issue as in some genres, as a lack
|
||||
of significantly processed examples resulted in consistantly low artificial
|
||||
of significantly processed examples resulted in consistently low artificial
|
||||
rating. This provided little data for comparison and thus reduced the
|
||||
quality of analyses created.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Familiarity of examples}\mbox{}\\
|
||||
It was noted that ome participants rated samples based on their knowlege of
|
||||
the entire song, rather than just the excerpt, due to prior knowlege of
|
||||
It was noted that some participants rated samples based on their knowledge of
|
||||
the entire song, rather than just the excerpt, due to prior knowledge of
|
||||
that particular recording. This may have affected outcomes and could be
|
||||
addressed through the use of corpus databases designed for music research,
|
||||
rather than popular music that may have been experienced before.
|
||||
@@ -370,7 +379,7 @@
|
||||
number of limitations due to the nature of undergraduate research prevent
|
||||
any conclusive findings. However, this could potentially form the basis for
|
||||
more in depth exploration of the effects of electronic processing on music,
|
||||
paticularly as this appears to be an under-explored area.
|
||||
particularly as this appears to be an under-explored area.
|
||||
This research provides preliminary evidence to suggest that artificial
|
||||
processing does have some form of impact on the acceptability of music and
|
||||
suggests that this does vary to a degree based on the style of music.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user