Finished features literature review section
This commit is contained in:
+17
-27
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ the most relevant of which are:
|
||||
splitting of the FHSs, in particular using wavelet
|
||||
decomposition~\parencite{LiangHuiying1997, Vepa2008}. This allows for
|
||||
the separation of components based on their frequency content in
|
||||
place of or addition to their temporal characteristics.\\
|
||||
place of, or in addition to their temporal characteristics.\\
|
||||
In addition, Machine learning algorithms have been employed, such as k
|
||||
Nearest Neighbour~\parencite{Gupta2007} and Neural
|
||||
Networks~\parencite{Oskiper2002} to improve segment classification.
|
||||
@@ -128,45 +128,35 @@ the most relevant of which are:
|
||||
In addition to direct analysis on the signal, the ability to segment
|
||||
and extract RR values from the signal allows for their statistical
|
||||
analysis, both in the time and frequency domain, for use as features.\\
|
||||
Dash et al. use a number of time-based statistical analysis on the RR
|
||||
Dash et al.\ use a number of time-based statistical analysis on the RR
|
||||
time series for the detection of atrial fibrilation. Statistical
|
||||
analyses such as RMSSD, Shannon Entropy and Turning-point Ratio are
|
||||
used as feature vectors for classification of
|
||||
signals~\parencite{Dash2009}. A similar approach is used by Yaghouby
|
||||
et al. for the generalized classification of heart abnormality. Here,
|
||||
other features such as HR Mean, Standard deviation, pNN50 and
|
||||
Triangular Index are used for classification with promising
|
||||
results~\parencite{Yaghouby2009}.
|
||||
|
||||
Frequency domain analysis of RR values can also be considered by
|
||||
calculating the PSD of the RR values via similar methods for spectral
|
||||
analysis as with the direct signal.
|
||||
|
||||
RR Frequency Domain Features
|
||||
|
||||
RR Time-frequency domain features VFCDM~\parencite{Dash2009}
|
||||
RR Non-linear features
|
||||
~\parencite{Yaghouby2009}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
signals~\citeyearpar{Dash2009}. A similar approach is used by Yaghouby
|
||||
et al.\ for the generalized classification of heart abnormality. Here,
|
||||
a selection of linear and non-linear features are used for
|
||||
classification with promising results~\citeyearpar{Yaghouby2009}.\\
|
||||
Frequency domain analysis of RR values are also used by calculating the
|
||||
PSD of the RR values via approaches such as VFCDM.\ This form of
|
||||
approach allows for higher resolution time-frequency representations of
|
||||
the RR data than approach such as the FFT or wavelet transform~\parencite{Wang2006}.
|
||||
From a spectral representations such as this, Yaghouby et al.\
|
||||
demonstrate the use of such descriptors for the discrimination between
|
||||
sympathetic and parasympathetic contents of the signal, not directly
|
||||
detectable through time domain analysis~\citeyearpar{Yaghouby2009}.\\
|
||||
Further in depth analysis of statistical features for HRV can be found
|
||||
in~\parencite{Electrophysiology1996}
|
||||
|
||||
\item Classification of signals for diagnostic purposes. The aim being to
|
||||
distinguish healthy signals from those with certain heart
|
||||
conditions/abnormality. Machine learning techniques are commonly used
|
||||
in order to distinguish between signals automatically, based on prior
|
||||
feature extraction.
|
||||
feature extraction.\
|
||||
it is noted in that there is a lack of research into other machine
|
||||
learning techniques such as bayesian classification and
|
||||
SVMs~\citeyearpar{}.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A variety of machine learning techniques trained on these extracted
|
||||
features. From this, a great deal of progress has been made in classifying a
|
||||
variety of cardiac abnormalities such as.
|
||||
|
||||
\pagebreak{}
|
||||
\printbibliography{}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user