Finished segmentation literature review
This commit is contained in:
+21
-14
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\title{ECS750P --- Final Project}
|
||||
\subtitle{\LARGE{Extraction and Analysis of RRi from PCG Signals for the
|
||||
\subtitle{\LARGE{Extraction and Analysis of RR Intervals from PCG Signals for the
|
||||
Classification of Heart Abnormalities}}
|
||||
\author{Sam Perry --- EC16039}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -84,21 +84,27 @@ the most relevant of which are:
|
||||
structure of the signal over time. This is a key stage in the analysis
|
||||
of PCG signals as relationships between the fundamental heart sounds
|
||||
(FHSs) form the basis for much of the further analysis performed on PCG
|
||||
data. A number of methods exist for the extraction of FHSs. Some rely on direct extraction of
|
||||
peaks in the time domain to determine the structure of a
|
||||
signal. These methods perform various transformation in order to
|
||||
accentuate the transient events.~\parencite{Groch1992, Liang1997}. However, these methods
|
||||
data. A number of methods exist for the extraction of FHSs. Some rely
|
||||
on direct extraction of peaks in the time domain to determine the
|
||||
structure of a signal. These methods perform various transformation in
|
||||
order to accentuate the transient events with the intention of
|
||||
isolating them~\parencite{Groch1992, Liang1997}. However, these methods
|
||||
tend to suffer significantly from background noise and so perform
|
||||
poorly in sub-optimal conditions.\\
|
||||
Other methods rely on spectral representations to
|
||||
assist in the splitting of the FHSs, in particular using wavelet
|
||||
decomposition ~\parencite{}. Machine learning
|
||||
algorithms have also been widely employed, such as k Nearest
|
||||
Neighbour~\parencite{} and Neural Networks~\parencite{} for
|
||||
predictions. Particular success has been observed in Springer's use of
|
||||
logistic regression and Hidden semi-Markov models~\citeyearpar{Springer2016}
|
||||
\item Methods for the extraction of statistical features from PCG data in
|
||||
order to create robust, meaningful representations of the data.
|
||||
Other methods rely on spectral representations to assist in the
|
||||
splitting of the FHSs, in particular using wavelet
|
||||
decomposition~\parencite{LiangHuiying1997, Vepa2008}. This allows for
|
||||
the separation of components based on their frequency content in
|
||||
addition to temporal characteristics.\\
|
||||
In addition, Machine learning algorithms have been employed, such as k
|
||||
Nearest Neighbour~\parencite{Gupta2007} and Neural
|
||||
Networks~\parencite{Oskiper2002} to improve segment classification.
|
||||
More recently, particular success has been observed in Springer's use
|
||||
of logistic regression and Hidden semi-Markov
|
||||
models~\citeyearpar{Springer2016}.
|
||||
\item A plethora of methods exist for the extraction of statistical
|
||||
features from PCG data. These features are used for the creation of
|
||||
robust, meaningful representations of the data.
|
||||
\item Classification of signals for diagnostic purposes. The aim being to
|
||||
distinguish healthy signals from those with certain heart
|
||||
conditions/abnormality. Machine learning techniques are commonly used
|
||||
@@ -116,6 +122,7 @@ A variety of machine learning techniques trained on these extracted
|
||||
features. From this, a great deal of progress has been made in classifying a
|
||||
variety of cardiac abnormalities such as.
|
||||
|
||||
\pagebreak{}
|
||||
\printbibliography{}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user