Updates to RMTP essay - added questionnaire as appendix
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
|
||||
\usepackage{blindtext}
|
||||
\setkomafont{disposition}{\normalfont\bfseries}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{pdfpages}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\graphicspath{
|
||||
{./resources/},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +34,16 @@
|
||||
{\endquotation\end{minipage}\end{lrbox}%
|
||||
\global\setbox\abstractbox=\box0 }
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{ifthen}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand*{\appendixmore}{%
|
||||
\renewcommand*{\othersectionlevelsformat}[1]{%
|
||||
\ifthenelse{\equal{##1}{section}}{\appendixname~}{}%
|
||||
\csname the##1\endcsname\autodot\enskip}
|
||||
\renewcommand*{\sectionmarkformat}{%
|
||||
\appendixname~\thesection\autodot\enskip}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{etoolbox}
|
||||
\makeatletter
|
||||
\expandafter\patchcmd\csname\string\maketitle\endcsname
|
||||
@@ -47,7 +60,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\title{Researching Music, Technology and Performance\\Summative Assignment 3\\Research Report}
|
||||
\subtitle{\LARGE{Is the Artificial Processing of Music Less Acceptable Based on Genre?}}
|
||||
\subtitle{\LARGE{Is the Acceptability of Artificial Music Processing Dependent on Genre?}}
|
||||
\author{Sam Perry\\U1265119}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,6 +69,74 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Background}
|
||||
Since the introduction of sound recording, audio technicians have sought
|
||||
ways to produce the highest quality musical recordings possible. More
|
||||
recently, technology has been used creatively for the improvement and
|
||||
alteration of recordings.~\parencite[p.80, 258-263]{millard2005aor} A
|
||||
plethora of tools and techniques have been developed with the aim of
|
||||
improving the quality of audio; Tools such as auto-tuners, compressors,
|
||||
equalisers and artificial reverbs have been created to alter the input
|
||||
sound in an infinite number of ways. Although this may seem like an
|
||||
obvious improvement in the production of music, it raises questions as to
|
||||
the quality and musicianship of the composers and performers. Where once an
|
||||
out of tune melody was unfixable, methods are now available for the
|
||||
specific purpose of hiding these imperfections. Room acoustics can now be
|
||||
transformed, drum rhythms tightened and dynamics altered to improve almost
|
||||
any aspect of the original recording. This potentially allows for greater
|
||||
degrees of of error from the origonal musician, allowing a technician to
|
||||
compensate.~\parencite{bbc2014crm}\\
|
||||
These techniques are used to varying degrees in different styles of music
|
||||
and are not purely used as a means for musical correction. Many musical
|
||||
genres use technology in varying aspects of their realisation. The
|
||||
invention of instruments such as the synthesizer has lead to a variety of
|
||||
electronic based musical genres and has greatly influenced modern popular
|
||||
music. Where a traditional classical music recording may utilise modern
|
||||
production techniques to produce the most accurate representation of the
|
||||
original performance, a electronic dance music recording may synthesise a
|
||||
significant amount of sound purely through electronic means~\parencite{}.\\
|
||||
Does this artificial synthesis and enhancement of sound detract from
|
||||
the listener's perception of the musicianship? This will be analysed to
|
||||
give an outline as to the possible relationships between these factors
|
||||
across a wide variety of musical genres.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Literature Review}\label{LR}
|
||||
Musical preference research - what influeces a persons perception of good
|
||||
music
|
||||
Musical talent research - what defines good musicianship?
|
||||
Historic research into reasons behind begining to creatively use technology for production.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Methodology}
|
||||
Research will be carried out through the use of a questionnaire to gather
|
||||
opinions on artificial processing in relation to a wide range of genres.
|
||||
A questionnaire has been created to collect quantitive data from annonymous
|
||||
participants. This data will then be analysed to reveal any correlations
|
||||
between view on musical quality and perceptions of artificial processing.
|
||||
These results will then be compared to previous research presented in
|
||||
section~\ref{LR} to give an overall understanding of the impact of
|
||||
artificial processing.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Procedure}
|
||||
The majority of original research will be carried out through the design
|
||||
and collection of data from a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed
|
||||
for the quantitive analysis of annonymous oppinions on the perceived
|
||||
artificialness and musical quality of a range of musical samples.\\
|
||||
The questionnaire was designed with two main sections. The first gave an
|
||||
indication of the participant's musical knowlege and preference, the second
|
||||
collected the main data based on the participant's use of a likeart scales
|
||||
to rate aspects of the excepts.
|
||||
\subsection{Participants}
|
||||
\subsection{Results}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
|
||||
\printbibliography
|
||||
|
||||
\appendix
|
||||
\gdef\thesection{\centerline{Appendix \Alph{section}}}
|
||||
\section{}
|
||||
The following pages show the final questionnaire used for collection of results.
|
||||
\includepdf[pages=-]{../questionnaire/questionnaire.pdf}
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user