Final version of FYP report. Added proposal for EM assignment 2. Added huddersfield masters proposal updates
This commit is contained in:
@@ -89,13 +89,13 @@
|
||||
\item D/A \& A/D converters
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
In order to understand the specification of the dsPIC in relation to the
|
||||
standard of DSPs available, it will be compared to three other digital signal
|
||||
processors:
|
||||
In order to understand the specification of the
|
||||
dsPIC~\parencite{mt2004dspic} in relation to the standard of DSPs
|
||||
available, it will be compared to three other digital signal processors:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Texas Instruments TMS320F2806
|
||||
\item Freescale 56F8025
|
||||
\item Analog Devices ADSP-2126
|
||||
\item Texas Instruments TMS320F2806~\parencite{ti2016pm}
|
||||
\item Freescale 56F8025~\parencite{fs2006dsc}
|
||||
\item Analog Devices ADSP-2126~\parencite{ad2012adsp}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{General Computing Factors}
|
||||
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@
|
||||
of calculations must be performed in a set period of time in order to
|
||||
process audio as quickly as it is provided to the system. If the clock
|
||||
speed is not sufficient, this may result in instructions being missed due
|
||||
to an interupt before the processor has been able to complete them. This
|
||||
can create in artefacts in output audio.~\parencite[p.34]{sd2006mfes}
|
||||
to an interrupt before the processor has been able to complete them. This
|
||||
can create artefacts in output audio.~\parencite[p.34]{sd2006mfes}\\
|
||||
|
||||
It should be noted that this is not an entirely accurate measurement for
|
||||
speed as different manufacturers have different definitions of a
|
||||
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
|
||||
performance. Variations of this have been used in all examples.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{DSP Specific Factors}
|
||||
DSP specific factors relate to components specically affecting the system's
|
||||
DSP specific factors relate to components specifically affecting the system's
|
||||
ability to handle audio signals. These will determine the quality of audio
|
||||
manipulation and affect the computational requirements for the system. This
|
||||
section briefly covers the computational impact of the DSP specific
|
||||
@@ -360,11 +360,10 @@
|
||||
menu button. Parameter variables can then be increased and decreased for
|
||||
the selected effect using two switches.\\
|
||||
It was not possible to use the UI in conjunction with any actual audio
|
||||
effect as proper threading of the menu alongside the DSP process was not
|
||||
possible. Having the menu run in the same thread as signal processing
|
||||
forced menu logic to complete at signal rate. When this did not occur this
|
||||
would create unexpected results and graphical error in the LCD as logic was
|
||||
not completed fully. As a result, the project presented is a prototype to
|
||||
effect as the UI would need to be processed after any audio effects. in
|
||||
practice this caused problems as the program did not always have time to
|
||||
complete UI logic before the interupt, causing graphical errors and
|
||||
unexpected results. As a result, the project presented is a prototype to
|
||||
demonstrate possibilities given a capable system.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Results}
|
||||
@@ -386,18 +385,35 @@
|
||||
equally simplistic results in terms of perception. A feedback was not
|
||||
implemented to differentiate this from the reverb design.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Chorus}
|
||||
The implementation provided a perceptually similar alternative to the
|
||||
infeasible modulated delay line design from the previous assignment.
|
||||
infeasible modulated delay line design from the previous assignment.
|
||||
Each delay can be set to up to a maximum delay time of 250 samples.
|
||||
This allows for manual shifting of phases to taste. Overall this
|
||||
results in a functional alternative at the cost of perceptual quality.
|
||||
Through the use of a spectrogram, it can be seen in figure
|
||||
\ref{fig:cho_spec} that the signal is clearly noisy and distorted with
|
||||
harmonics produced far above the nyquist rate. This is most likely due
|
||||
to the poor converter performance
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\caption{Chorus spectrogram displaying distortion}
|
||||
\makebox[\textwidth]{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Chorus_spectrogram}}
|
||||
\label{fig:cho_spec}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Reverb}
|
||||
A crude slapback reverb was created using an FIR/IIR filter
|
||||
combination. The result was a short reverb tail with decaying
|
||||
repetitions of the dry sample. This would have been vastly improved
|
||||
with the addition of further parallel comb filters or all pass filters.
|
||||
A clear decaying echo can be see in figure \ref{fig:rev_wav}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\caption{Reverb waveform}
|
||||
\makebox[\textwidth]{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Click_reverb_waveform}}
|
||||
\label{fig:rev_wav}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Further Work}
|
||||
Building on skills learnt in this project, results could be improved
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
|
||||
\documentclass{scrartcl}
|
||||
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
||||
\usepackage[british]{babel}
|
||||
\usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
|
||||
\DeclareLanguageMapping{british}{british-apa}
|
||||
\usepackage{mathptmx}
|
||||
\addtokomafont{disposition}{\rmfamily}
|
||||
|
||||
\addbibresource{~/PerryPerrySource/LaTeX/ExperimentalMusic_Bibliography.bib}
|
||||
\DeclareCiteCommand{\citeyearpar}
|
||||
{}
|
||||
{\mkbibparens{\bibhyperref{\printdate}}}
|
||||
{\multicitedelim}
|
||||
{}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\title{Experimental Music\\Formative Assignment 2\\Essay Proposal\\}
|
||||
\author{Sam Perry\\U1265119}
|
||||
\subtitle{The role of electronics, feedback and amplification in
|
||||
experimental music composition.\\}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Essay Objectives}
|
||||
This essay will explore the ways in which prominent composers utilise
|
||||
electronic devices and systems to compose music; focusing primarily on
|
||||
feedback and amplification as techniques for creating and manipulating
|
||||
sounds in both the analog and digital domain. This will provide a detailed
|
||||
overview of these widely used processing techniques, and will explore the
|
||||
reasons behind their popularity amongst experimental composers. The
|
||||
advantages and disadvantages of using these techniques will be explored in
|
||||
detail with regards to established concepts, and the aesthetics of such
|
||||
effects.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Subject Rationale}
|
||||
Electronics have played a key role in the development of experimental music
|
||||
in the past fifty years and have had a dramatic effect on the ways in which
|
||||
experimental music is realised. The ability to control amplitude and cause
|
||||
feedback has influenced a number of compositions, which will be explored in
|
||||
this essay.\\
|
||||
Examples of compositions include:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Acoustic Feedback}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Steve Reich's Pendulum Music~\parencite[p.31]{reich2002wom}
|
||||
\item Robert Ashley's The Wolfman~\citeyearpar{ashley2003w}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Electronic Feedback}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item David Tutor's Untitled ~\citeyearpar{tudor1996twfle},
|
||||
Toneburst ~\citeyearpar{tudor2004lem}, and
|
||||
Pulsers ~\citeyearpar{tudor1996twfle}
|
||||
\item Gordon Mumma's Hornpipe~\citeyearpar{mumma2002lem}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Amplification}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item John Cage's Cartridge Music~\citeyearpar{cage2013cm}
|
||||
\item Stockhausen's
|
||||
Mikrophonie~\citeyearpar{stockhausen1995mmt}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Areas of Interest}
|
||||
The areas that will be explored in detail in this essay include:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Types of amplification and feedback}\\
|
||||
This will discuss the different variations of the techniques based
|
||||
on the development of technology and the implications of these
|
||||
variations.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label*=\arabic*.]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Analog feedback}\\
|
||||
Referring to the use of a microphone and loudspeaker to
|
||||
generate an amplified feedback loop of sounds in the cross-over
|
||||
field between the two.~\parencite[p.185]{holmes2012eaem}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Tape feedback}\\
|
||||
Referring to the technique of recording input to a tape and
|
||||
looping over a playhead to produce repetitions in the output
|
||||
signal. Used by Robert Ashley in "The
|
||||
Wolfman".~\parencite[p.186]{holmes2012eaem}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Electronic feedback}\\
|
||||
An alternative to tape feedback which works entirely
|
||||
electronically, where a signal is ``generated within an
|
||||
electronic instrument whose design enables the recirculation of
|
||||
a signal within a closed circuit''.
|
||||
~\parencite[p.187]{holmes2012eaem} This technique features heavily
|
||||
in David Tudor's works.
|
||||
~\parencite{tudor1996twfle, tudor2004lem}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Feedback manipulation}\\
|
||||
The delay in time between a direct signal and a feedback signal
|
||||
allows for the manipulation of repetitions. This gives scope
|
||||
for a wide range of possible manipulations to the overall
|
||||
output and is explored in pieces such as Gordon Mumma's
|
||||
``Hornpipe''. ~\parencite[p.390]{holmes2012eaem}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Digital feedback}\\
|
||||
With the growing use of computers for musical processing,
|
||||
feedback is possible in the digital domain, as it is in the
|
||||
analog domain. This allows DSP techniques to be applied to
|
||||
feedback loops leading to significant advancements in effects
|
||||
such as artificial reverb, giving even further scope to the
|
||||
possibilities for composers.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Artificial Amplification}\\
|
||||
Amplification is an important part of any feedback system as it
|
||||
allows for control over both initial input and the feedback
|
||||
loop. It also allows for ``small
|
||||
sounds''~\parencite[p.6]{cage2011silence} to perceived at much
|
||||
higher volumes than they naturally occur. This is explored in
|
||||
John Cage's ``Cartridge Music'' and Robert Ashley's ``The
|
||||
Wolfman''.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Reasons for interest in these techniques}
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label*=\arabic*.]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Indeterminacy}\\
|
||||
Due to the ``exponentially complex patterns of information flow
|
||||
in feedback networks''~\parencite[p.11]{weisert2010ioi},
|
||||
feedback adds an element of indeterminacy to composition. The
|
||||
build up of audio on each repetition causes varying and often
|
||||
unpredictable effects in the output
|
||||
sound.~\parencite[p.100]{nyman1999em} This will be compared to
|
||||
other techniques for introducing indeterminacy (such as John
|
||||
Cage's use of the I Ching).
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Rhythmic/Temporal implications of feedback}\\
|
||||
Feedback allows for the repetition of a sound source over an
|
||||
extended period of time. This has implications rhythmically that
|
||||
can be controlled by the composer. The level of signal feedback
|
||||
will determine the decay and repetition of a signal and can
|
||||
create infinite loops of a single source sound. The
|
||||
implications of this will be discussed with reference to
|
||||
compositions such as Alvin Lucier's ``I am sitting in a
|
||||
room''.~\parencite[p.57-59, 64-68]{weisert2010ioi}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Dynamic implications of artificial amplitude
|
||||
adjustment}\\
|
||||
Both directly and as part of a feedback system, artificial
|
||||
amplification will change the perceived level of the input
|
||||
sound. This allows composers to artificially boost or attenuate
|
||||
sound in compositions and, in conjunction with a feedback loop,
|
||||
control feedback decay. This will be discussed with reference
|
||||
to many of the compositions discussed above (this is used to
|
||||
varying degrees across practically all previously discussed
|
||||
compositions.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Forms of control}
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label*=\arabic*.]
|
||||
\item \textbf{Process and systems}\\
|
||||
Due to it's unpredictable nature, feedback can be difficult to
|
||||
control and can produce unexpected results. Composers have used
|
||||
a variety of methods to structure and control feedback as part
|
||||
of their compositions.~\parencite{weisert2010ioi} These
|
||||
processes will be explored to understand the different methods
|
||||
for structuring compositions when composing using feedback.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Potential Issues}
|
||||
The area of feedback in experimental music has a greater depth than
|
||||
initially anticipated (as does amplification). This essay may focus more
|
||||
heavily on feedback than amplification although both will be discussed as
|
||||
they are intrinsically linked. This may need more thought when planning the
|
||||
essay.\\
|
||||
Further refinement of areas may also be needed to focus on the most
|
||||
important aspects of the subject. This will become clear through writing
|
||||
the first draft.
|
||||
\printbibliography
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
Notes for Essay:
|
||||
|
||||
Systems:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use of electronics for the creation of "systems":
|
||||
|
||||
why this is interesting for composers?
|
||||
The use of "sonification" in computer music allows for the bypassing of
|
||||
symbolic musical notation, instead opting to drive musical events
|
||||
through use of other data types (such as arbritrary weather information
|
||||
for example)
|
||||
This allows composers to distance there own discourse from the creation
|
||||
of music, relinquishing control to the data to greater degrees than is
|
||||
easily acheiveable through acoustic music.~\cite[p.129]{mclaughlin2011dsma}
|
||||
|
||||
- Not bound by the limitations of human performance or the timbres of
|
||||
traditional instruments~\cite[p.351]{holmes2012eaem}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,6 +8,29 @@
|
||||
\restylefloat{table}
|
||||
\usepackage{perpage}
|
||||
\MakePerPage{footnote}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
% Create hyperlinks in bibliography
|
||||
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||||
|
||||
\newsavebox{\abstractbox}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{etoolbox}
|
||||
\makeatletter
|
||||
\expandafter\patchcmd\csname\string\maketitle\endcsname
|
||||
{\vskip\z@\@plus3fill}
|
||||
{\vskip\z@\@plus2fill\box\abstractbox\vskip\z@\@plus1fill}
|
||||
{}{}
|
||||
\makeatother
|
||||
|
||||
\DeclareCiteCommand{\citeyearpar}
|
||||
{}
|
||||
{\mkbibparens{\bibhyperref{\printdate}}}
|
||||
{\multicitedelim}
|
||||
{}
|
||||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
||||
\usepackage{blindtext}
|
||||
\setkomafont{disposition}{\normalfont\bfseries}
|
||||
|
||||
\addbibresource{~/PerryPerrySource/LaTeX/Hud_masters.bib}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user